Chevy SS Forum banner
41 - 50 of 50 Posts
2017 Lincoln MKZ 3.0T AWD Test ? Review ? Car and Driver

0-60 in 4.8 seconds, 13.4@105 1/4 mile. With Michelin Pilot Super Sports .93G and 156 feet 70-0. Ride and handling are not nearly as good as the numbers that they got from those sticky tires would indicate. They said that it is spring way too softly which doesn't do the car any favors when it's trying to go fast in turns, and that it torque steers pretty bad when you try to accelerate out of corners. They describe the ride as riding on 4 basketballs, and say the car must have been tuned for all season touring rubber, and not the Michelin PSS. I'm disappointed in the acceleration numbers, I would have expected about a 1/2 second quicker, but the car weighs over 4300 lbs so that will hurt the acceleration.
 
Discussion starter · #42 ·
2017 Lincoln MKZ 3.0T AWD Test ? Review ? Car and Driver

0-60 in 4.8 seconds, 13.4@105 1/4 mile. With Michelin Pilot Super Sports .93G and 156 feet 70-0. Ride and handling are not nearly as good as the numbers that they got from those sticky tires would indicate. They said that it is spring way too softly which doesn't do the car any favors when it's trying to go fast in turns, and that it torque steers pretty bad when you try to accelerate out of corners. They describe the ride as riding on 4 basketballs, and say the car must have been tuned for all season touring rubber, and not the Michelin PSS. I'm disappointed in the acceleration numbers, I would have expected about a 1/2 second quicker, but the car weighs over 4300 lbs so that will hurt the acceleration.
Thanks for the link!

Seems like the review is right about what we expected for the car.
 
They went the wrong direction with this. It should have had the voodoo motor from the GT350, M6, and RWD. I would shell out GT350 money for that sedan in a heartbeat. The exhaust note alone is worth the money.
 
That is one ugly front end since as they state a crunched front end, sort of like new Malibu crunched front end. Hey Lincoln you don't need to copy front ends, the reason your cars don't sell is because they are overpriced Fords. Ford has to figure this out at some point but not likely.
 
They went the wrong direction with this. It should have had the voodoo motor from the GT350, M6, and RWD. I would shell out GT350 money for that sedan in a heartbeat. The exhaust note alone is worth the money.
The Voodoo has no torque down low... Would make a horrible motor for a luxo sedan.
 
I would love to exchange the SS for something else in a few years. I know that about myself. I grow tired easily.

The issue with everything available is they lack that stick shift thingie that I absolutely will not compromise on.

Guess Ill be keeping the SS......for longer than I've ever kept a car.
I am exactly the same way... I imagine my next car will self-driving as that will be the only alternative for me as I will miss the manual transmission but would be willing to have a car that drives for me giving me the time to do other things and avoiding the frustration of driving a boring car on the road with other stupid drivers.
 
My take on these cars from ford (pretty much anything with an ecoboost), be it SHO, explorer, MKZ, Fusion Sport, you name it... It will be a rats nest of problems in 10 years and 150,000 miles.

Let me explain. 2 reasons why I feel this way;

1) When I buy something, I buy it with intention of keeping it WELL past warranty expiration. My Suburban is 18 years old, my GTO is 13, My Cadillac is now 11, my older Chrysler van is 10 years old, the Impala is now ~8... I think you see my trend there. At which time, that means those costs to maintain and repair are on my dime, and not to mention, my time is money. Of all those (the exception being the Cadillac), all are K.I.S.S. pushrod V8's or a V6. Parts are dirt cheap, Parts are plentiful, Parts on the GM's in some cases are interchangeable, and they're stupid easy to work on. When you factor in additional complexity of turbos, intercooling, plumbing that goes along with it, heat, etc, etc., these new TTV6 wonder engines become a nightmare to work on.

Which leads to point 2
2) I worked on cars (GM) for a living. My time is money and I get paid to move sheetmetal through my two stalls. While I can't spend all day doing PDI's and oil changes (I would love to though), I dread when something like this came in because I get charged book time on what the manufacturer says it will take to repair their wonder contraption. Sometimes that time works, however, many times, especially the first one or two you do and you develop that learning curve, you end up losing and it takes money of your pocket. Meaning, I'm stuck working on something that is a stubborn PITA and not getting paid for my time over the book time, when I could me moving on to a simple fuel pump on a Tahoe. Take all that additional complexity then add in the fact that 99.999999999999999999999% of the people that own/will own these, don't take care of the friggen thing, only complicates matters. "Oh, my turbo uses the engine oil to lubricate the bearings? I guess that 7,500 mile interval I was doing probably wasn't the best idea...", "Oh, coolant last 150k?" I've got 175k on it... "Oh you mean I have to change plugs?? The manual says 100k..." Arrgggg.,.. The problem really becomes an issue for owner #2, 3, and so on.

And I guess a third point... V8, M6, RWD > *
 
Anyone have new experiences related to this old thread? I've seen used '17 - TTV6 AWD with 20k miles nearly fully loaded Reserve for $32k. That's a whole lot of goods to consider for $20k off MSRP, if you're into that kind of thing.
 
41 - 50 of 50 Posts