Chevy SS Forum banner
1 - 20 of 36 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
173 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·

Rick Hendrick, owner of Hendrick Motorsports, with the new Chevrolet SS street model after it and a racing version, back left, were unveiled at Daytona International Speedway on Saturday.

DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. – Blame booming Chevrolet, which that has more new vehicles to introduce than it knows what to do with, that the all new 2014 Chevrolet SS rear-drive performance sedan was introduced to the public and the media in the infield of Daytona International Speedway hours before the Nascar version of the SS was to debut on track in the first race of the season, a preliminary to the Daytona 500.

Chevrolet, you will recall, had the new Corvette and Silverado truck line to promote at the Detroit auto show. At the Chicago auto show, it introduced the 2014 Cruze Turbo Diesel, the company’s first diesel-powered car in nearly 30 years. There is a full slate of introductions scheduled for the New York auto show, which starts March 29, including the first look in the United States at the next-generation Corvette convertible.

So Chevrolet packed up its top executives and shipped them to Daytona, where the SS – the company’s first rear-drive performance sedan since the 1996 departure of the Impala SS – was shown to enthusiastic Nascar fans surrounding a cordoned area in the Daytona fan zone infield.

The Nascar connection is important because 2013 marks the debut of all-new body styles for the Nascar Sprint Cup series. Over the last six years, Nascar had homogenized the looks of the Nascar Chevrolet Impala, Ford Fusion and Toyota Camry to the point where the only difference was head- and taillight decals. The manufacturers insisted on cars that looked more like their road-going counterparts – after all, Nascar and the manufacturers have long embraced the “Win on Sunday, Sell on Monday” mentality, and that was viable when the on-track cars were, or at least resembled, converted street cars.

So Chevrolet took the opportunity to change its Nascar racer from the front-drive Impala to the rear-drive, V-8-powered SS, and for 2013, Nascar allowed the three manufacturers enough design latitude to race cars that actually resemble the models they are ostensibly based on. These Gen 6 cars – or the sixth generation since Nascar started in 1949 – should bring some brand identity back to the sport.

The SS is the first Chevrolet to wear the SS, or Super Sport, name as its lone moniker, having for decades been paired with higher-performance models like the Impala SS and Camaro SS. The 2014 SS is a one-size-fits-all model, loaded with such standard equipment as leather upholstery, a nine-speaker Bose sound system, heads-up data display, a color touch-screen navigation system and parking assist, which has sensors that allow for hands-free parallel parking.

The engine is a 415-horsepower, 6.2-liter V-8, and the transmission is a six-speed automatic with TAPshift technology, meaning you can change gears using paddle switches on the steering wheel. Big Brembo disc brakes sit inside forged aluminum wheels. Tires are Bridgestone Potenzas – 245/40ZR-19 up front, 275/35ZR-19 in the rear. The weight, just under two tons, is lightened a bit by an aluminum hood and deck lid.

Inside, there is plenty of room for four 6-footers, with decent room for a fifth passenger. Instruments and controls are plain, but easy to read and access. Pedals are covered with drilled aluminum plates. The trunk is huge.

The price (as well as a presumably grim E.P.A. fuel-economy rating) has not been revealed, and won’t be until the fourth-quarter sales effort begins, but expect it to be about $45,000, a little more with a sunroof, the lone option.

Development of the SS has been largely under the radar, mostly because the car wasn’t developed in the United States. The SS is a product of Holden, G.M.’s Australian division. Whether American consumers care is mostly unknown: The list of Australian-built cars sold in the United States is short and not particularly distinguished. It includes the Mercury Capri roadster, which arrived in 1991 with the unenviable mission of taking on the red-hot Mazda Miata. Also, some Mitsubishi Diamantes came from Down Under.

In 2004, Pontiac revived the GTO, adapting the Holden Monaro as a $35,000 V-8-powered coupe that suffered slightly from jet lag: the position of the fuel tank, for instance, required that in order to pass American standards, Pontiac had to weld a partition in the trunk that cut cargo space in half. Improvements were made quickly, and the 2006 model was a very good car, but it came too late and production ended then.

Pontiac again turned to Holden in 2008, rebadging a Holden Commodore as a Pontiac G8 rear-drive sedan, with V-6 or V-8 power, and was planning to import a trucklike version similar to the Chevrolet El Camino, as well as a station wagon, when the Pontiac brand was shut down amid G.M.’s financial crisis. The 2009 G8s were the last.

The fact that General Motors in the United States has not forgotten its Australian affiliate can be traced directly to Mark Reuss, the G.M. president and a mechanical engineer. He served as Holden’s chairman and managing director in 2008 and 2009, and it was no coincidence that shortly after his return to the United States, it was revealed that Chevrolet would import a rear-drive dedicated police car from Australia called the Caprice PPV, for police patrol vehicle. While, like the SS, it’s a rear-drive sedan, Mr. Reuss stresses that the SS is not a civilian cop car, the way the last rear-drive Impala SS was – the SS and the considerably larger PPV are built on separate Holden platforms. But there’s no arguing that in terms of making a business case for importing cars from Holden, it made sense that the more cars you can load on the boat for America, the better.

All that said, Chevrolet is not looking at the SS as a major mass-market possibility, though the Holden factory can crank out as many as Chevrolet wants. Annual sales of 20,000 would be good, and 25,000 would be spectacular for what amounts to a niche, one-brand vehicle, since there are no plans for other American G.M. brands to share the SS.

“This is our flagship,” said Mr. Reuss, obviously proud. To be really proud, though, it needs to sell in the showrooms, and win on the track. The last part should be easy: Kevin Harvick won in his SS in the Sprint Unlimited Nascar race hours after the SS debut, and Danica Patrick qualified her SS on the pole for Sunday’s Daytona 500.

The 2014 SS: Chevrolet Answers a Question, but Was Anybody Asking? - NYTimes.com
 

· Banned
Joined
·
517 Posts
The "question" many people are asking is:
"Can you offer me a daily driver with ALL WHEEL DRIVE, 4 doors, and a convenient transmission".

We already have the Corvette for ultimate performance.
We already have the CTS-V for a high performance sedan.
We already have the Camaro for "affordable" performance.

We needed the SS to fill a void.
The OPTION of AWD would have filled the void.
Manual should have been standard, and a dual clutch transmission should have been optional in 2013.


You disagree with me?
Then answer this:
Why should I replace my Corvette with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?
Why should I replace my CTS-V with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?
Why should I replace my Camaro with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?

I'll give you the honest answer:
The SS offers NOTHING that makes it worthy of replacing anything in my garage, or adding to it.


The SS is a FAIL.
Apparently, GM still has a bunch of idiots making decisions and they can't figure this out on their own.

As much as I LOVE GM and the LSx drivetrains, the G37x (Q50) is a much better daily driver, runs 13 second 1/4 miles, offers ALL WHEEL DRIVE, and I bough mine BRAND NEW for $33k with a sunroof.

Come close or beat that GM and I will GLADLY start buying new GMs every year again. If not, Corvette and Denali are being replaced with a GTR and an Audi S7.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,140 Posts
AWD is the way to go, especially if you want a good all around performance vehicle. Just look at some of the best performing vehicles around at the moment, Nissan GT-R, AWD Lamborghini's. etc. Not saying RWD isn't good but AWD would be nice
 

· Registered
Joined
·
151 Posts
You disagree with me?
Then answer this:
Why should I replace my Corvette with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?
Why should I replace my CTS-V with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?
Why should I replace my Camaro with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?

I'll give you the honest answer:
The SS offers NOTHING that makes it worthy of replacing anything in my garage, or adding to it.


The SS is a FAIL.
Apparently, GM still has a bunch of idiots making decisions and they can't figure this out on their own.

As much as I LOVE GM and the LSx drivetrains, the G37x (Q50) is a much better daily driver, runs 13 second 1/4 miles, offers ALL WHEEL DRIVE, and I bough mine BRAND NEW for $33k with a sunroof.

Come close or beat that GM and I will GLADLY start buying new GMs every year again. If not, Corvette and Denali are being replaced with a GTR and an Audi S7.
I disagree with you. It's not a Vette, Camaro or CTS-V. It's not even in the same class as any of them. You're trying to make the SS is into something it never was going to be. Outside of the Infiniti you continue to compare it with cars in another class. Everybody knows GM can't put a Chevy in the price point with Cadillac because it would cannibalize Caddys sales. All the stuff you want on an SS will do just that. Is the SS perfect, NOPE. Should it have had the new Vette engine, YEP. Should they have offered a 6/7 speed, MAYBE. Time will tell. As for now, it's decent stop gap (price pending of course) until the new SS hits in 2016 or whenever.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,792 Posts
After owning one GTO, one GXP M6 G8, and one G8 GT I am in the group GM is targeting for buyers. Anyone who has owned one or more of the Holden based cars mentioned GETS it why GM and Chevrolet are producing this car. For the folks who DON'T get it why bother spending any time on this site? Yes there are competitors in this vehicle category; what fun would it be if there wasn't any competition? For an all around decent size vehicle with RWD and V8 power and six forward speeds (yes, I'm not happy the 2014 is missing the M6 but I suspect 2015 will introduce the manual trans) you simply cannot beat this car in my opinion. It is however an educated opinion having owned several of the products. Have my nasty 2010 Camaro SS to play with in the summer and it suits a very specific purpose. I've had a 2011 Denali for daily use the last 18 months and as great a vehicle as it is it simply doesn't hit the daily driving style I enjoyed during G8 ownership. I will buy a 2014 SS and then probably a year later buy a 2015 M6 equipped SS. These cars go away soon due to CAFE requirements so get a V8 RWD sedan while you can and quit grousing about what it is and what it is not. If it is not for you move on....
 

· Registered
Joined
·
173 Posts
I can see the good and bad side to the SS. Yes the big performance sedan segment is well saturated with many of them, I can list out a bunch! But one big reason why I can see someone buying the SS sedan over others is because of the brand it's from or that it's a "domestic" vehicle. It's not common that I see some pro-chevrolet guy consider buying a Lexus, Infiniti, BMW or Mercedes.

In a way it fills a void but it's definitely not something ground breaking in the industry.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
517 Posts
I disagree with you.
-For the folks who DON'T get it....
-For an all around decent size vehicle with RWD and V8 power and six forward speeds
If you don't agree with me, then what does the SS Sedan offer that answers the following questions:


Why should I replace my Corvette with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?

Why should I replace my CTS-V with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?

Why should I replace my Camaro with the Chevy SS, or add the SS to my garage?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
151 Posts
If you read my post it was stated clearly. I have no plans on getting in an argument with you so it is what it is. If you have to replace something, that's on you. "I" have no plans on replacing anything in my garage, but I may ADD an SS to the stable. Good luck on whatever YOU do.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
517 Posts
If you read my post it was stated clearly. I have no plans on getting in an argument with you so it is what it is. If you have to replace something, that's on you. "I" have no plans on replacing anything in my garage, but I may ADD an SS to the stable. Good luck on whatever YOU do.
If you cannot intelligently answer the legitimate questions that I have presented below,
then you are agreeing with me that the SS offers no benefit to the existing market and that the SS is a complete FAIL.



If you don't agree with me, then what does the SS Sedan offer that answers the following questions:


Why should I replace my Corvette with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?

Why should I replace my CTS-V with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?

Why should I replace my Camaro with the Chevy SS, or add the SS to my garage?














In response to the perceived condescension from 2 posters:
I underlined the fact that I would be adding to my collection.
Owning a couple Pontiacs doesn't make you an expert on anything or more educated than the rest of us who buy new GMs every year.
I won't be going anywhere.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
517 Posts
Wow, that's the best you can do lol. Stay classy why don't you.
You are the one ducking the intelligent questions that were politely presented.
Intelligently answer the questions or you are just agreeing with the facts that I have presented.
I'll post them again below for reference:


If you don't agree with me, then what does the SS Sedan offer that answers the following questions:


Why should I replace my Corvette with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?

Why should I replace my CTS-V with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?

Why should I replace my Camaro with the Chevy SS, or add the SS to my garage?
 

· Banned
Joined
·
517 Posts
As much as I'd think an AWD SS would be nice. I can't help but think it would be expensive.

That's why AWD should be an OPTION.
Dodge only charges a $2,300 premium for AWD on a V8 Charger.
In the Northeast, almost every performance sedan ordered at the projected price point of the SS Sedan is ordered with AWD.

AWD will offer the ONLY benefit that the SS Sedan can offer the existing market.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
719 Posts
That's the corvette though. The SS is a new model. I don't think they would risk the money and time in producing an AWD model at a premium to not know if the model will be successful. You never know maybe in the future there will be an AWD model. For now I just wonder if they will bring a manual transmission option.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
151 Posts
You really don't get it do you. You were that kid that cried like a lol when you didn't get your way in the sandbox huh? The only one who hasn't presented themselves intelligently is you. Read my original post and take it from there. If you'd like I could sound out all the tough words for you. As I said earlier, buy whatever makes YOU happy. That's all the intelligence YOU need. Good Luck
 

· Banned
Joined
·
517 Posts
That's the corvette though. The SS is a new model. I don't think they would risk the money and time in producing an AWD model at a premium to not know if the model will be successful. You never know maybe in the future there will be an AWD model. For now I just wonder if they will bring a manual transmission option.
Dodge only charges a $2,300 premium for AWD on a V8 Charger.

As a national auto executive, I don't thing the facts that I have stated can be argued against.

that kid that cried like a lol when you didn't get your way in the sandbox huh?
Posts like the one above make it painfully obvious that those that have been critical of the facts that I have presented cannot intelligently refute my points or answer the questions that I have posed below.
The sad fact is, the SS Sedan offers no feature added benefit to the existing GM portfolio and cannot compete with the other manufacturers if it does not offer AGGRESSIVE pricing or the OPTIONS of AWD and DCT.


If you don't agree with me, then what does the SS Sedan offer that answers the following questions:


Why should I replace my Corvette with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?

Why should I replace my CTS-V with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?

Why should I replace my Camaro with the Chevy SS, or add the SS to my garage?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
148 Posts
If you don't agree with me, then what does the SS Sedan offer that answers the following questions:


Why should I replace my Corvette with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?

Why should I replace my CTS-V with the SS, or add the SS to my garage?

Why should I replace my Camaro with the Chevy SS, or add the SS to my garage?
You wouldn't replace a Corvette with an SS. They simply attract two completely different buyers. As if someone interested in a Corvette would consider an SS and vice versa.

The CTS-V starts at 65k.

The Camaro is a two door!

The SS is a performance sedan for families or others that need the full size room offered at a moderate price point. You say you keep providing facts but you really have yet to post one.
 
1 - 20 of 36 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top