Chevy SS Forum banner
1 - 20 of 123 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
220 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Hey SS bros,

So I got really tired of having to clean the front wheels after every drive. It seems like chrome is a magnet to semi-metallic brake pads. Especially the ones in the SS.

Anyway, I ordered ceramic brake pads (rockauto) and will be trying them on soon. I've done my research and though a few people may say that they wear out the rotors quicker, I'm willing to try them out. Anyone done this yet? I have ceramic brake pads in my beater car and have yet to replace them after at least 2 years... Also, barely any brake dust.

Opinions and experience welcome! Thanks.

-Hadder
 

· Registered
Joined
·
68 Posts
Ceramic pads are softer than semi-metallic ones so whoever told you they wear out rotors faster is wrong. Also, are you sure the factory pads are semi-mets? OE has been shifting towards ceramic for a while due to the fact they are quieter and dust less.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
30 Posts
I switched to ceramic pads on my Trailblazer SS for the exact same reason, and was very happy with the results. The wheels would stay clean looking for weeks rather than hours. I am going to look into doing the same for the SS, it's good to know there are ceramic pads available.

The OEMS are definitely semi-metallic. Manufacturers have switched to ceramic for mainstream cars, but just about every performance oriented car uses semi-metallic as it does provide better ultimate performance although in street driving, I have found ceramics to be excellent without any noticeable reduction in braking performance.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
110 Posts
This appears to be the only one....for front

Plenty of options for the rear
What are some of the options for the rear? I'm planning on ordering the ceramic pads to go on the front and put them on when I take my winter tires off (if this winter ever ends :shrug:).

Is there any changes in maintenance for the ceramic brake pads? JEGS, which had the best price at $39.99, is trying to up-sell me on some ceramic brake lubricant when I add the brakes to my cart.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
3,373 Posts
rear ceramic pads

Powerstop Evolution Ceramic (same brand as front)
More Information for POWER STOP 161352
More Information for POWER STOP 171352 w/hardware

Raybestos
More Information for RAYBESTOS ATD1352C
More Information for RAYBESTOS PGD1352C

Centric
More Information for CENTRIC 10513520

Further comments (this is just me talking):

GM works very hard to come up with a pad package for every vehicle that meets all required performance parameters. The use of alternate pads, all which have claims about their performance or other superior characteristics, have not typically been validated or vetted by the vehicle manufacturer.

Generally aftermarket pads will cost less until the really high-performance pads (ie. racing formulations) are considered. GM "production" pads are more expensive, and in many cases the cost is partially a reflection of whether some hardware may be included, which is not always the case with aftermarket pad packaging. Other factors regarding the cost difference(s) include the production volume of the vehicle, thus the specific pad(s) used are impacted by how many pieces a supplier is going to make to satisfy the production run and replacement stock of that part by specific PN--fewer cars produced, higher cost per brake pad set for the low-production SS.

Aftermarket sources can generally offer pads that fit for less because in many cases there is commonality on another vehicle that uses the same caliper or at least the same pad as identified by FMSI (Friction Materials Standards Institute), even if the various OEM's have specific friction specs for their versions, the aftermarket will make a more generic friction formulation and put it in their catalog(s) as fitting several different vehicles which happen to use a common caliper family--this is becoming very common with the Brembo calipers that so many OEM's are now using.

FWIW, here's the GM front production pad PN for the SS Brembo brakes:
92291022 - List price is $308.77, dealer cost is $186.56

What gets me riled is that so many owners (I'm not pointing fingers, just making an observation) shop brake pads, rotors, and other brake & undercar parts by price rather than quality or whether the parts are at least equivalent to OE or better.

In the case of the SS, a $45K car (my first home in 1975 was $41K by way of comparison) that can run 150MPH+ and weighs about 3900#, I would want to be SURE that I'm using the best possible components in the brake system--even if they create some nuisance noises or make more dust than I'd like.....but that's just me.

Off soapbox.....
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,962 Posts
I beleive I read somewhere on this site that the ceramic replacement pads available for our Brembo's might have a pad counterweight to wheel balancing weight clearance issue. And the member actually either moved the wheel balance weights and/or ground the pad counterweights for clearance. I could be wrong, but this has kept me from going head strong into changing them out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeC1003

· Registered
Joined
·
543 Posts
My solution to brake dust is simple. Brown Royal wheel cleaner. I simply spray it on to the wheels before I do a wash and rinse it right off after letting it sit for about a minute. I don't touch the wheels and the inner barrels get clean too!

I was messing around with my brothers car yesterday.

About a months worth of driving on plastidipped wheels

Brown Royal applied and sprayed off, no touching of the wheels whatsoever.


IMO, there is nothing out there that can clean brake dust off better. I have used Sonax and Iron X too, but they are expensive and you still have to agitate with those cleaners.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
382 Posts
Just my $0.02, I've run both street and race pads from Centric and they make quality components. Most everyone will say the same thing. Worth the money if you're looking for a performance improvement. Can't comment on dust - my wheels were dark and I rarely washed them.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
3,373 Posts
HB453Z.585 | Hawk Performance

FMSI pad specs covered:
D1001
D1016
D1050

Information for BENDIX MKD1474 (for 2014 SS & Camaro SS)

Information for PowerStop Z17 Evolution Ceramic 171050 (fits 2010-up Camaro front D1050) - pad thickness is less than FMSI spec used by Hawk, Bendix and others

There is crossover of FMSI D1050 & D1474 - 2014 SS sedan is FMSI pad spec D1474 (with dampers), and 2010-2014 Camaro SS, Bendix lists both specs - pad thickness listed as 0.614" (15.6mm) with shim vs 0.585" for Hawk pad (may not include shim thickness).

Yes, the Hawk pads will fit & work--not clear whether Hawk has not added D1474 under the same PN (HB453), or if the intent is to develop a separate spec--there is no specific cross-reference to 2014 SS. Hawk has not included the dampers on their pads--HB453 covers both 2009 G8 GXP (OE pads with no dampers) and 2010-2014 Camaro SS (OE pads with dampers).

Curious what Hawk may have to say about deletion of the dampers.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
15,299 Posts
Further comments (this is just me talking):

GM works very hard to come up with a pad package for every vehicle that meets all required performance parameters. The use of alternate pads, all which have claims about their performance or other superior characteristics, have not typically been validated or vetted by the vehicle manufacturer.

Generally aftermarket pads will cost less until the really high-performance pads (ie. racing formulations) are considered. GM "production" pads are more expensive, and in many cases the cost is partially a reflection of whether some hardware may be included, which is not always the case with aftermarket pad packaging. Other factors regarding the cost difference(s) include the production volume of the vehicle, thus the specific pad(s) used are impacted by how many pieces a supplier is going to make to satisfy the production run and replacement stock of that part by specific PN--fewer cars produced, higher cost per brake pad set for the low-production SS.

Aftermarket sources can generally offer pads that fit for less because in many cases there is commonality on another vehicle that uses the same caliper or at least the same pad as identified by FMSI (Friction Materials Standards Institute), even if the various OEM's have specific friction specs for their versions, the aftermarket will make a more generic friction formulation and put it in their catalog(s) as fitting several different vehicles which happen to use a common caliper family--this is becoming very common with the Brembo calipers that so many OEM's are now using.

FWIW, here's the GM front production pad PN for the SS Brembo brakes:
92291022 - List price is $308.77, dealer cost is $186.56
Exactly!

Lining materials and brake systems are highly tested/validated and also the performance of such is incorporated into the stabilitrac and anti lock software.

Change friction/performance change more than dust!

What mfr is going to say their pads don't stop as well as OEM?

Aftermarket consolidates p/n's ie: if it fits without modification and functions (not necessarily to OEM standards for the SPECIFIC install) it's a go!

Source: Confidential GM and aftermarket engineering sources and SAE papers.
 
1 - 20 of 123 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top