Chevy SS Forum banner

1 - 20 of 44 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
517 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
The story of the 2014 Chevrolet SS: "Luxury, power, refinement, handling"


The story of the 2014 Chevrolet SS: "Luxury, power, refinement, handling"




By Jonathon Ramsey RSS feed
Posted Mar 7th 2013 8:01PM

21

Comments17



Not including the women and men who built it, the 2014 Chevrolet SS has only been seen in person by a piddling number of people – fewer humans than would fill the gymnasium at a high school volleyball game. Not including the men and women who built it, no one has driven it. Even so, it is already saddled with two controversies: the way it looks and the way it shifts.

First to that shifting. Did we love the last Americanized Holden, the awesomely sportsome Pontiac G8 GXP, and its six-speed manual? Of course. Do we wish the SS came with a six-speed manual? Of course. But we'd like a toboggan to come with a manual transmission. We'd put a manual transmission on a weasel if we could because we're just wired that way; if it moves, it should come with a stick and a clutch. Or at least the option.

Let's climb down off the ledge, though. We haven't driven the SS and we have no idea how good (or not) the automatic is. And the Hobson's Choice in transmissions when it comes to sport sedans like the BMW M5, Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG and Jaguar XFR-S and, oh yeah, cars-that-really-should-have-manuals like the Audi R8 and Nissan GT-R and Porsche 918 and every single Lamborghini and Ferrari, for instance, hasn't stopped us from enjoying what is clearly the gruesome, dual-clutched demise of Western automotive civilization. Because in spite of our ululations at the dying of the six-speed light, we understand.

All we're saying is sure, we're disappointed, but let's drive it first – then we'll find out if this is something more than a philosophical tragedy. When we asked what were the chances of a manual we were thrown the bones of "it's a possibility down the line," and that's all we need to go to
.

To that other, bigger controversy: the way it looks – it seems many of you were expecting more, or at least more different. However, as far back as 2009 it was acknowledged that the VF Holden Commodore would be an overhaul of the VE series, and mainly under the skin at that. There was neither the money nor the business case to create a brand new car. If there is an issue with the looks of the SS, it's our opinion that we might have discovered 90 percent of the cure in the sedan's trunk.
Ever since it became clear that Pontiac had a permanent dinner date with Hades, people began suggesting – strongly – that General Motors keep the G8 coming but as a Chevrolet. Now that it's here – true, five years has passed – there's a vocal group saying, "Well, that's not exactly what we meant." Here are the 2008 Pontiac G8 GXP:



A 2012 Holden Commodore SSV – essentially still the VE Commodore first introduced in 2006 and upon which the G8 was based:



And the 2014 Chevrolet SS:



It's clear that designers also incorporated details from the Holden Special Vehicles GTS into the new 2014 Commodore SS and Chevrolet SS:



Looks are subjective and we're not trying to change anyone's minds, but there is your evolution. Make of it what you will. What do we think? It's certainly subtle, and we do think the rear end has too much Malibu, but we're fine with the looks. It wasn't the design that surprised us, though, it was the way we couldn't tell if the exterior of the SS is really a junkie for chrome or if it's merely the silver hue of the reveal car that's playing tricks on us. Before any more sinister judgment, we'd like to spend some personal time with a sedan in a dark color. Even with that, though, we think those chrome-plated door handles need to go. Aspirational mid-sizers and pickup trucks get shiny handles; once you've made it, you're supposed to be beyond those kinds of shiny flourishes. We would not complain if Chevrolet added a chrome delete to the two other options on the SS purchase sheet – sunroof and color.




It was when lead engineer for the SS, Dave Leone, showed us the full-sized spare in the trunk that we thought "This could get a lot better." Instead of a chromed 19-incher there was an alloy wheel in flat black. Evidence would also indicate a very different personality for the car when in another car: this Commodore SSV – without shiny handles – looks the business.



There will be plenty of time to resolve that issue. It is under that bright skin where the deepest allure of the SS is said to reside. The G8 GXP was momentous because it was a blistering drive that could fit five people. With five years of engineering progress, the drive part of the SS equation should be as safe as betting on the sunrise.

We don't have all of the numbers yet, but the ones we do have at least point the way to goodness. Lead engineer Leone said the VF Commodore has lost almost 95 pounds (43 kilograms) compared to the VE, the lightening a part of General Motors' Efficient Fundamentals initiative. Beyond the aluminum hood and decklid, other parts made of the lighter-than-steel material include items like the instrument panel structure and lower control arms. "You make a car lighter and it does everything better," he said. Hear, hear.

Losing weight on those upper panels has lowered the center of gravity and there's a near 50/50 weight distribution. The staggered 19-inch wheels (the rear track is wider than the front) ride on – and will be sold on – Bridgestone Potenzas, the front tires being the same spec as those on the Ferrari California, the rear tires the same as those specced on the Aston Martin DB9. Put it all together and Leone says the SS can achieve a maximum lateral acceleration of nine Gs. This definitely nothing like last rear-drive performance sedan Chevrolet made: the late-nineties Impala SS.



We were told the handling of the Commodore and the SS are "very close" – the exact phrase we got regarding the SS was "It's tuned for the Chevrolet brand," made no more clear with "It's dynamic but relaxed as an everyday driver." The buyoff rides for its handling were done in the US, but since "the Chevrolet brand" includes the Spark on one end and the Corvette ZR1 on the other, we'll wait for seat time to figure out what that means for a halo sedan. And it might not make a difference to the Aussies in the crowd, but Leone also said the Commodore will have "a little less power" than the square 415 horsepower and pound-feet of torque that we'll enjoy.

Where does it fit? Without a price we'll wait to see which crowd Chevrolet wants to attack, but when you're talking about full-sized hi-po rear-wheel drive performance sedans you're pretty much talking about the SRT versions of Chrysler and Dodge sedans and a couple of Germans – and now that the Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG has gone 4Matic, perhaps that's just one German. The Taurus SHO is all-wheel drive and we omitted the Cadillac CTS-V because we were told more than once about the SS, "It's not a CTS-V."

The Charger SRT starts at $45,990, the 300 SRT at $49,990 (after $995 destination charges on both) and both sedans output a square 470 hp and lb-ft; 55 hp and lb-ft more than the SS. Leone said the SS is "about 315 pounds lighter than the Dodge" – the Charger SRT coming in at 4,365 pounds – the SS is still being quoted as having a 0-60 mile per hour time of "about five seconds," the SRT options have both broken into the low-to-mid four-second mark. The 400-hp BMW 550i takes five seconds to get to 60 mph and starts above $62,000, the 560-hp BMW M5 posts the same sprint times, but it starts on the far side of $90,000. A discussion of cross-shopping would be purely theoretical, but Leone's take was, "For BMW buyers, this might be a better place to spend their money."




Chevrolet is perhaps most proud of what the SS driver will experience in everyday use of the car, calling it "the perfect mix of refinement, sophistication and technology." The cross-stitched, cut-and-sew materials on the instrument panel are properly padded. There's a seven-inch touchscreen displays a MyLink system that just won a Best of CES award in the car category at this year's Consumer Electronics Show, and a full-color heads up display. The advanced park system, showing up for the first time on any Chevrolet, will parallel and reverse park at the push of a button. The rear cross traffic alert monitors oncoming vehicles up to 66 feet on either side of the SS. The front sport seats are supportive everywhere and still comfortable, and we had plenty of room in back with the front seats set to our driving position. The illuminated readouts inside the HVAC dials look properly luxurious. Said Leone of the technology and materials refinement in the SS, "We never had that kind of sophistication before."



We agree, and after one short evening of being able to crawl around in it, we found nothing inside to complain about. We hope to say the same about the entire car after we drive it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
151 Posts
Good find on the article. So what do you think? :D

Rob
#1 The SS Sedan should have launched with a LT1 and a TR6060 as the base drivetrain.
#2 GM better price this thing at Charger R/T levels if it wants to sell them
#3 GM needs to start offering the OPTIONS of ALL WHEEL DRIVE and a DUAL CLUTCH TRANSMISSIONS on their performance cars.


MMM- The only thing dated and ugly was your ex-girlfriend before she discovered some standards.
22 hours ago

Different forum same old Robbie




Rob
Manuals should be the base transmission with a dual clutch transmission as optional on all performance cars in 2013. If only one trans can be offered, it should be a DCT.
22 hours ago
+1
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
151 Posts
It never gets old or redundant for Little Man Robbie, whining and crying
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
517 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
It never gets old or redundant for Little Man Robbie, whining and crying
So says the tough guy who runs his mouth while hiding behind his keyboard.
Sorry your life is so miserable that you have to troll internet forums. :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
151 Posts
Says the Little Man Robbie who trolls all the forums spewing the same useless crap. I'm still waiting Rob or Robbie!
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
517 Posts
Discussion Starter #8 (Edited)
Good find on the article. So what do you think? :D

After looking at those pictures lined up like that, it amazes me how much better Holden makes the same car look.
And then, being a basic color guy who only goes for black or silver, I realize how great that rust orange looks.

Frankly, GM should just bring the identical car over from OZ and just place a bowtie in the center of the Holden logo's circle.
Why can't GM figure this out on their own ????

The way that it "appears" the SS Sedan is being received by the general public has me concerned about sales. Not good.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
148 Posts
After looking at those pictures lined up like that, it amazes me how much better Holden makes the same car look.
And then, being a basic color guy who only goes for black or silver, I realize how great that rust orange looks.

Frankly, GM should just bring the identical car over from OZ and just place a bowtie in the center of the Holden logo's circle.
Why can't GM figure this out on their own ????

The way that it "appears" the SS Sedan is being received by the general public has me concerned about sales. Not good.
X2. They should've just left an already pleasing design alone. I don't get why GM feels the need to change anything.

Is funny how different the ss looks from pic to pic depending on color, lighting etc. The last pic in the article makes the SS look like boring as.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
379 Posts
Agree the car in silver looks a little bland shot in broad daylight. The photo of the orange car is heavily retouched, though, to give it the illusion of being more aggressive looking. Making a car appear lower also gives the illusion that it's wider. The very dark undershadow on the orange car does that. Over saturating the highlights on the body contours make the contours appear more pronounced, hence more aggressive looking sheet metal.

If you look at the GM released beauty shots of the SS, the car appears to be several shades darker than it really is, with a lot of blue undertones. They manipulated that image in the same way as the orange car's image. By making the SS darker, it gave them some room with the contrast to over amp the bright highlights. The SS also got a very dark under shadow.

In short, if you put the orange car out in broad daylight and took an unretouched photo, it would look equally unimpressive.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
517 Posts
Discussion Starter #11 (Edited)
I think the SS has better lines and looks more modern than the G8.
I believe removing the bowtie from the grill, along with a complete debadge, is going to be very popular.
Some CCW 505a wheels, or cheaper versions, would be a nice addition as well.
I would run identical wheel/tire sizes at all 4 corners with an all season tire like a 255/40/19.

I probably will end up with a SS as a daily beater.
It just really pisses me off AWD and DCT aren't options and that the LT1 and TR6060 isn't the base drivetrain.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
154 Posts
I've been concentrating on the interior, which I really like. I haven't been looking so much at the exterior. Other than the bowtie, what are the obvious differences between the Holden and the Chevy? I know I will notice more differences over time, just curious about what everyone's opinions are.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,644 Posts
In short, if you put the orange car out in broad daylight and took an unretouched photo, it would look equally unimpressive.
Having seen the Real deal Holden Variants in the metal in Real Daylight, they are more impressive then the photo's display them to be, I am not a huge fan of silver though but would tend to think the Chevrolet SS will look a lot better in real life. Though they should offer you guys a wider colour pallette ie if we get a colour you should too not just 5 basic colours. plus a manual shifter, Even I still cant get over that. It is like GM offering up the new Vette as a "Global Car" but saying no RHD cos Britain and Japan take LHD we wont bother to market it truly Globally and would much rather save a buck than to garner a more favourable image internationally.

You guys want a manual SS some want a DCT AWD. I just want a factory RHD Vette with factory warranty.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,140 Posts
I think the SS has better lines and looks more modern than the G8.
I believe removing the bowtie from the grill, along with a complete debadge, is going to be very popular.
Some CCW 505a wheels, or cheaper versions, would be a nice addition as well.
I would run identical wheel/tire sizes at all 4 corners with an all season tire like a 255/40/19.

I probably will end up with a SS as a daily beater.
It just really pisses me off AWD and DCT aren't options and that the LT1 and TR6060 isn't the base drivetrain.
SS looks by far better than the G8 in every way!
Even though the G8 had it's american badazz look going on, I really think no GM sedan in it's class or close to it can match the beauty of the SS (unless im missing out on something).

The rest haven't been as appealing.


I've seen quite a few vette's rocking those CCW 505a's and they look really good. Would be a great aftermarket wheel option for the SS, might even be some on the classifieds.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
719 Posts
It just really pisses me off AWD and DCT aren't options and that the LT1 and TR6060 isn't the base drivetrain.
I think we got that one around here :D

I don't think anyone was happy that it wasn't available in DCT or AWD.

It also doesn't come in manual either. Not perfect but it would still make a quick daily driver if I can get it for a good price.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,644 Posts
I've driven a couple older GTR's when I used to work in a car yard. ( they do drive hard ;) but I have just never been into them enough to buy. At the end of the day I am a Holden tragic therefore GM man through and through. If I was to spend money on a toy I would go HT Monaro with a big block 427. Cos thats what the Vette would be for me, A toy just not at the 200k price tag after conversion. My Daily driver will be traded next year for the update SS-V.
Why not just pick up a Nissan GTR and be done with it?
I hated the GTR and was a non-believer, but it's a proven performer now.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
317 Posts
Let me know where I can buy a 2014 GTR for $45k and one that can seat 5 adults.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Commodoreman2000

·
Registered
Joined
·
397 Posts
Let me know where I can buy a 2014 GTR for $45k and one that can seat 5 adults.
Exactly. GT-R's can be had for a really good price these days but not $45k. I also believe maintenance on these is pretty high. I remembering hearing some crazy high price of $5000-7000 just for a full brake service. So just imagine what other things might cost you.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
517 Posts
Discussion Starter #20 (Edited)
Buy a 2013 Audi S6 for $70k.
It's a good deal for what you get.

The aftermarket solved all of the GTR's inflated maintenance costs.
It's just a shame the GTR gets "exotic car attention" on the road, Nissan raised the invoice $30k with ZERO improvements, and the **** thing is UGLY.
But, I'd be driving one if the first 2 issues I stated were fixed.
 
1 - 20 of 44 Posts
Top